To all likelihood the alleged chemical weapon attack in Syria is a false flag. As in 2013 Bashar al-Assad must be a completely lunatic when he poisons his own people in order to sabotage any peace talks. It is far more plausible that US Foreign Secretary Rex Tillersons‘ remarks on the Syrians‘ right to choose who is their president has stirred up forces in the dark. As usual mainstream media buy all lies and admit indirectly that their agenda is disinformation as they keep relatively vague. Which means: if they had the slightest proof against Assad they would have framed him in the center of their reporting.
In 2014 the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons OPCW has destroyed all stockpiles stored by the Syrian Government which denied any use of such weapons against the population. Soldiers from Austria (experts for ABC weapons) took part in this mission but it is forgotten now as the government remains silent on the new accusations against Syria. In 2013 the deep state tried to drag the US and the world into an open war in Syria by claiming Assad’s forces used poison gas. Now the pattern enfolding is quite similar and it reminds us of the „weapons of mass deception“ and the Iraq war in 2003. Four years ago Austria got a new formal defense minister, Gerald Klug, whose first task was to end the UN peacekeeping mission at the Golan Heights by suddenly withdrawing our forces.
Kevork Almassian explains what is going on
Videos from a protest in New York show how leftists and Muslims both pause to several „Allahu Akbar“ cries. This is more than at the Women’s March in Berlin, Germany where a woman on the stage suddenly yelled „Allahu Akbar“ two times. So the real agenda gets more and more clear without revealing too much to those who still follow it. While President Trump was called a liar as he pointed at the situation in Sweden violence errupted in the once peaceful Skandinavian country. It is still most important that Sweden has a „feminist government“ which is not worried about the rising rape rate and willing to wear a Hijab when visiting Iran.
Mainstream Media now critize Marine Le Pen, the Head of Front National, who refused to wear a headscarf so a meeting with the Grand Mufti in Lebanon was cancelled (while Michelle Obama got support for that visiting Saudi Arabia). They bashed her because she didn’t submit to rules applied only to women and oppressive from feminists‘ point of view. Who is now really a „feminist“ – Le Pen or Swedish Ministers who want to be (quite traditional) nice girls? If you watch videos from the „I’m a Muslim too“-march in New York with leftist solidarity it makes you shiver because that is designed to be our future. Infowars created Social Justice Warrior „Rainbow Snatch“ and demonstrates how parody meets reality.
It could be easy to decide whether Trump is trustworthy or not: take a look at mainstream media and you know nodody is attacked relentlessly who is a hostage of the deep state. But we must try to understand what he and his loyal supporters are doing and what their enemies are planning. To learn everything about Trumps known decision goes far beyond the capacities of everybody so we have to concentrate on what is imporant for us. As a non mainstream but real journalist his handling the press is indeed impressive.
He acts authentic and handles several challenges in one press conference. First business as usual as he speaks about measures and plans in different fields. So far it has been a normal press conference similar to others given by politicians. Then he chooses as during his campaign a language every citizen can understand knowing many would see at least some excerpts. And finally he addresses the hidden fakestream agenda to denounce him and his family and to get him removed from office based on lies. Remember how the Iraq war in 1991 was sold to the public? By false claims that after the invasion of Kuwait babies were thorn out of their incubators. The key story was published in December 1990 by the Washington post quoting Amnesty International, a „human rights“ intelligence front.
Trumps press conference on February 16
Fake news MSM very quickly reported that according to Amnesty International 13.000 persons were executed in Syrian prisons over the last years. They didn’t even be so „fair“ to say that Amnesty itself is vague and estimates between 5.000 and 13.000 people being killed. Of course the Syrian Justice Department denied the accusations and stated that executions only take place after a legal several level procedure – but it is the voice of a dictator in our official narrative. The Government points at its successful fight against the US (deep state) and NATO backed terrorists and speculates that Amnesty should divert attention from that.
The „report“ was immediately critized in alternative media as it consists of hearsay mostly by persons who haven’t been in Syria for years (see Moon of Alabama’s analysis) and as Tony Cartalucci points out in was completely fabricated by the Amnesty headquarter in London. They engaged the compagny „Forensic Architecture“ to construct a 3D prison model based on satellite images and hearsay: „Amnesty International’s report lacked any actual evidence, with its presentation consisting instead of admittedly fabricated images, sounds, maps, and diagrams. Amnesty – lacking actual evidence – instead abused its reputation and the techniques of classical deception to target and manipulate audiences emotionally. What Amnesty International is engaged in is not ‚human rights advocacy,‘ but rather politically-motivated war propaganda simply hiding behind such advocacy.
One of the „enemies“ of many European politicians and MSM is the Hungarian Government which defends European values and culture and refuses to call illegal immigrants „refugees“. The pattern of covert influence via more than 60 Soros funded NGOs is visible in Hungary as in other countries but the Government takes steps against it. So Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto openly spoke about the undermining of society in a recent RT interview. The Minister critizes NGOs for claiming that they represent the citizen’s wishes and demands and asks who has elected them and who has given them a mandate. He says that it always is the Government and the Parliament which have to represent the population and that NGOs with foreign funding lack transparency.
„The approach that NGOs represent the society is very dangerous“ he puts it and describes a situation similar to other European countries where hijacked NGOs also see themselves as „the“ civil society speaking for „the“ decent and human parts of the population. This non legitimized NGOs (Szijjarto questions that „non“ governmental is the correct term) frame all who don’t want illegal mass immigration from Muslim countries as indecent and inhumane. At the same time they turn their backs on domestic poverty and homelessness but light the people up to protest for free public transport for „refugees“ and to offer them free housing privately and whatever these migrants (mostly young men) might need.